System design
Work through API boundaries, failure modes and the reasons behind a candidate’s approach to service design.
Backend & Systems · Manchester & UK
Find backend engineers who can reason about systems, not just list technologies. We help Manchester and UK teams define the requirement and assess production judgement before a candidate reaches your interview stage.
Ryan brings 10+ years of software engineering experience to a peer-to-peer technical conversation. We agree the assessment with you first, then explain the evidence behind each introduction.
See our technical screening processWork through API boundaries, failure modes and the reasons behind a candidate’s approach to service design.
Explore database choices, transactions, query behaviour, messaging queues and caching in the context of actual requirements.
Ask how engineers deploy, observe and debug services, including cloud responsibilities and decisions made during incidents.
We work with product businesses of around 10–200 employees, including funded teams. Manchester and the North are our initial local focus; working arrangements can be remote, hybrid or on-site across the UK.
We support searches across Node.js and TypeScript, Python and FastAPI, Java and Spring Boot, Go, and C#/.NET Core. Scope can include microservices, AWS or GCP, and SQL or NoSQL systems. We agree the essential stack and the depth of specialist assessment required for each role.
We use a technical discussion grounded in systems the engineer has worked on: API design, database modelling, scaling decisions, caching, messaging queues and failure handling. We ask why choices were made, what failed and what the engineer would change. The shortlist records evidence and any areas requiring deeper client assessment.
Yes. We agree location, office expectations, working arrangements and any eligibility requirements before mapping candidates. Our initial local focus is Manchester and the North, with searches across the UK where the role allows.
Our focus includes senior engineers, tech leads and principal-level roles. Scope and screening differ: leadership, technical influence and ownership need different evidence from individual implementation experience.
Discuss the work, the role and the technical evidence that matters. Start with a conversation, not a stack of unvetted CVs.